xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstests

To: stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfstests
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 20:43:05 -0500
Cc: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3B217C2C.A31D6ECC@idcomm.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
"D. Stimits" wrote:
> 
> How important is it to run the cmd/xfstests? The extra partition
> requirement can be a pain to come up with, but if the xfstests are more
> or less just there for good feelings now, I might consider ignoring it.
> What do I gain or lose by running or not running the xfstests?

You gain warm fuzzies that the CVS tree you checked out is functioning
more or less correctly.  :)  If you have an "official" release, I
wouldn't even bother with the tests unless you're just curious.

If you're using CVS snapshots on a machine of any importance, running
through the tests on a new kernel might be good.  I generally make sure
any change I commit can pass all the tests, but sometimes things sneak
through.

And as a side note, even if a test fails, it is often the case that the
test itself, rather than XFS, has broken as a result of some change...

-Eric

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • xfstests, D. Stimits
    • Re: xfstests, Eric Sandeen <=