xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: find ./. file size > 2 GB

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: find ./. file size > 2 GB
From: CaT <cat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:11:27 +1000
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200106070010.f570AAk21738@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:10:10PM -0500
Organisation: Furball Inc.
References: <cat@zip.com.au> <200106070010.f570AAk21738@jen.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:10:10PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> > debian stable needs 2.4.x and a recompile of glibc and you're sweet.
> > 
> > (currently running a >2gig mysql db on such a beastie. one of the files
> > is >2gig and it's all sweet)
> 
> Just to add to this discussion, even with an LFS enabled user space, there
> still appear to be some apps which have not been rebuilt with the correct
> compile options. tcsh is an example, I recall question about this a while
> back, and without rebuilding tcsh with some glibc 64 bit define it was
> incorrectly reporting information on files greater than 2Gbytes.

yup. forgot to add that after recompiling glibc you'll need to recompile
any utils which will need to access >2gig files.

-- 
CaT (cat@xxxxxxxxxx)            *** Jenna has joined the channel.
                                <cat> speaking of mental giants..
                                <Jenna> me, a giant, bullshit
                                <Jenna> And i'm not mental
                                        - An IRC session, 20/12/2000


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>