| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: When'll XFS be part of Linux vanila or RedHat Linux. |
| From: | Juri Haberland <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 May 2001 14:08:01 +0000 (UTC) |
| Distribution: | local |
| Organization: | spoiled dot org |
| References: | <200105301938.f4UJcia19124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3B15BA11.B01037F2@xxxxxxxx> <20010531071025.307CB125E6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (OpenBSD/2.9 (i386)) |
Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2001 23:27:13 -0400 Bryan J. Smith <Bryan J. Smith > <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > >> So far, RedHat and VALinux have snubbed ReiserFS because of its lack >> of a traditional inode structure that has issues with some services >> (like NFS). They have shown support for Ext3. Unfortunately, Ext3 >> is not available on 2.4 yet. > > No longer true - there was something about 2 weeks ago, a couple of > other guys have taken over from Stephen and ar porting it to 2.4 > > Unfortunately I've lost the URL, ISTR it was on sourceforge but > wouldn't like to bet. Have a look at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ or the cvs at gkernel.sourceforge.net. Juri -- Juri Haberland <juri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs cvsup offline, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs cvsup offline, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re[2]: When'll XFS be part of Linux vanila or RedHat Linux., Keith Matthews |
| Next by Thread: | 2.4.5 compiles, almost:(, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |