xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - fix panic caused by mix of local and remote access to xfs

To: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - fix panic caused by mix of local and remote access to xfs
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:38:04 -0500
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Tue, 29 May 2001 10:30:09 CDT." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105291029560.8330-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> That means it's been tagged?

I am not sure what you mean by tagged, I checked in a fix for the problem
with the implementation I checked in on Friday, and in cleaning my mail
box I saw that I had said I would do a followup under the same heading.

Steve

> 
> -- 
> Austin Gonyou
> Systems Architect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-796-9023
> email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> On Tue, 29 May 2001, Steve Lord wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > Sod's law says you find the hole right after you ship the code. There is 
> a
> > > bug in this code, I would not do a cvs update until I get a fix in, I kno
> w
> > > roughly how to fix it, but it will take me a while to code and test it.
> > >
> > > I would hold off on the cvs tree for a while until you see another messag
> e
> > > from me on this thread - probably not today.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> >
> > This was fixed over the weekend by the way.
> >
> > Steve
> >



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>