xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - fix panic caused by mix of local and remote access to xfs

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - fix panic caused by mix of local and remote access to xfs
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:11:29 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200105291538.f4TFc4H07995@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
The tree has been updated for everyone with all newest changes since
friday, so this fix can be checked out?

-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 29 May 2001, Steve Lord wrote:

> > That means it's been tagged?
>
> I am not sure what you mean by tagged, I checked in a fix for the problem
> with the implementation I checked in on Friday, and in cleaning my mail
> box I saw that I had said I would do a followup under the same heading.
>
> Steve
>
> >
> > --
> > Austin Gonyou
> > Systems Architect, CCNA
> > Coremetrics, Inc.
> > Phone: 512-796-9023
> > email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > On Tue, 29 May 2001, Steve Lord wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Sod's law says you find the hole right after you ship the code. There is
> > a
> > > > bug in this code, I would not do a cvs update until I get a fix in, I 
> > > > kno
> > w
> > > > roughly how to fix it, but it will take me a while to code and test it.
> > > >
> > > > I would hold off on the cvs tree for a while until you see another 
> > > > messag
> > e
> > > > from me on this thread - probably not today.
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > >
> > > This was fixed over the weekend by the way.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>