xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS recovery

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS recovery
From: glenn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 05:13:48 -0500
In-reply-to: <20010527113048.A25389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ak@xxxxxxx on Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:30:48AM +0200
References: <20010525194531.C20904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010527113048.A25389@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:30:48AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Been running 2.4.2-XFS for a while.  Been telling myself
> > to upgrade that thing for a while--never did, and now I've
> > got a blown up filesystem to show for it.  Oops.
> > 
> > 80 gig drive, filled to under 1.5 gigs free, about 5-10
> > active FTPs running at once.  Hard crash, kernel panic
> 
> Is it possible that you ran out of memory (main memory+swap)
> when this happened? (the "tried to kill init" message points to it; 
> it used to be a bug in 2.4.2 that it did that on oom) 

I'm not sure, but I'd be inclined to say no--it's a 128M box with
relatively little running on it.  (Apache, standard small daemons, no X.)

I'm not sure what could have caused this level of damage so quickly,
either.  I *can* get reasonable looking output from xfs_ncheck--it seems
to sidestep the nuked files well enough; I have no idea if this output
is useful, though.  (I'd just run a full repair and see what came out,
but I don't have another drive large enough to dump this one to.)

Is it fairly safe to mount -o ro,norecovery?  (Of course, it may
fail to mount altogether, but it's worth a shot.)

--
Glenn Maynard

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>