xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: XFS performance drop after uptime (was: So far, so good)

To: "Federico Sevilla III" <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux XFS Mailing List" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: XFS performance drop after uptime (was: So far, so good)
From: "Juha Saarinen" <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 19:16:04 +1200
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105241319300.637-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

:: on a Pentium III 733MHz with 512MB RAM and 4 x 30.6GB UDMA/66 7200RPM IBM
:: hard drives on a RAID 5 array with a 3ware Escalade 6400 controller. I'm
:: running the latest (well, as of yesterday GMT+0800) CVS of XFS.

What's the chip set on that system? Intel or VIA?

It's a huge difference, and I wonder why. I don't see this kind of variation
on a single-CPU 440BX P2 system.

I've now tried with both SCSI and IDE drives -- same result. The hdparm
results drop in both cases after a certain amount of uptime (haven't been
able to figure out how much yet).

Also tried running in single mode, with the same result.

The kernel version doesn't seem to matter.



-- Juha


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>