xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS

from [Chris Wedgwood] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 21:14:27 +1200
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B060131.48917575@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 10:14:25PM -0700
References: <156560000.990028380@tiny> <3B060131.48917575@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i 
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 10:14:25PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:

    reiser4's architecture will be strongly influenced by the XFS
    pioneered delayed allocation concept, and I would like to thank
    the XFS team for aggressively ensuring that I understood the
    benefits of it.

So what are the 'advantageous' you see in reiser4 over XFS when it is
available?



  --cw
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Hans Reiser
Next by Date:  Re: dump/restore and setuid/setgid files, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Hans Reiser
Next by Thread:  Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Austin Gonyou
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]