| To: | Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS |
| From: | Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 May 2001 22:14:25 -0700 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Namesys |
| References: | <156560000.990028380@tiny> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Chris Mason wrote: > > Thanks Chris, I totally agree, and at the moment I am much too busy to > > spend time in a performance competition. I should also state that I have > > never regarded the different filesystem on Linux as being in direct > > competition with each other, there will always be benefits to using each > > different filesystem for their strong points. Plus having several > > filesystems under active development means that there will be a tendency > > for the developers to make theirs the best, the implementations improve, > > and everyone wins. reiser4's architecture will be strongly influenced by the XFS pioneered delayed allocation concept, and I would like to thank the XFS team for aggressively ensuring that I understood the benefits of it. Hans |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Hans Reiser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |