[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS

To: Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:59:48 -0500
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx> of "Wed, 16 May 2001 11:53:00 EDT." <156560000.990028380@tiny>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> reiserfs acls are so fast, its like they aren't even there ;-)
> > 
> > XFS ones will be fast too - if they fit in the inode, which can be
> > achieved if you know what you are doing (inode size is a mkfs option). 
> Really, the reiserfs acls aren't even there.  Anyone doing benchmarks
> should think about the XFS features reiserfs doesn't have, turn some off
> (acls), and leave some on (delayed allocation, O_DIRECT).
> -chris

See, shows how much I know about reiserfs and why I am not qualified to
to do real benchmarks on it ;-).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>