No. In the 2.2.0 release, the configuration checks things differently. I have
asked Sean to send me the relevant configuration info to check.
On 16-May-2001 Klaus Strebel,ITS,204 wrote:
> Sean Elble wrote:
>
>> Hello (again!),
>>
>> I downloaded the latest Samba and XFS CVS versions
>> yesterday, and tried to compile ACL support, yet
>> again. I'm still getting the same message, that
>> doesn't specify if XFS ACL suppor is being enabled! I
>> really need some help . . . I've put the acl.h file in
>> /usr/include/linux/acl.h, and I have
>> /usr/lib/libacl.a, but it _still_ isn't working. John,
>> I thank you for all of your help, but, I really don't
>> know why this isn't working. Is there any way I can
>> force Samba to put XFS ACL support in? I'm desperate
>> at this point. One more thing; I'm using Windows 2000
>> RC2 (Beta); now, I doubt this means anything, since it
>> isn't explicitly stating the support was enabled, but,
>> just letting you know . . . Thanks again for all of
>> your valuable help.
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> just can't get the box i first tried it (some weeks ago, samba-2.2.0 was
> not released then ;-) ). Have a look to the configure script of samba.
> They are checking for IRIX platform ACLs only if on irix, because
> xfs-acls are irix acls, you have to convince configure for this test,
> that it is on irix platform. This should bild samba with xfs-acl
> support, but i couldn't test it by now, no spare time (sigh).
>
> If you don't find how to cheat it, let me know, i'll try to find it
> tomorrow.
>
> Bye
> Klaus
--
John M. Trostel
Linux OS Engineer
Connex
jtrostel@xxxxxxxxxx
|