| To: | Matt Bernstein <mb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 May 2001 10:05:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Matt Bernstein <mb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Wed, 16 May 2001 12:08:46 BST." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105161159400.2837-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > [ I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs, please cc me ] > > We have managed to get a Debian potato system (with the 2.4 updates from > http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian plus xfs-tools which we imported > from woody) to run 2.4.3-XFS. > > However, in testing a directory with lots (~177000) of files, we get the > following oops (copied by hand, and run through ksymoops on a Red Hat box > since the Debian one segfaulted :( ) > > HTH, > > Matt > Can you describe your testing beyond using a directory with 177000 files in it? Also, can you explain how you obtained the xfs code, from a patch, from the cvs development tree, or from somewhere else? Thanks Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How to Use Red Hat Install CD Without a Bootable CD Capability?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Oops with 2.4.3-XFS, Matt Bernstein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS, Matt Bernstein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |