| To: | lmj@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch problem |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 May 2001 10:00:17 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <0105160210265M.00126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
lmj@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Another question. How stable is this patch compared to > patches for 2.4.2 and 2.4.3? And the answer to this is, it's NOT stable compared to 2.4.2 and 2.4.3. It's a snapshot of a point in time when the patch was made. In fact, it's possible (although unlikely) that it won't even compile. Unless you're planning on tracking CVS and the mailing list to stay up to date, you should use either the 2.4.2 or 2.4.3 patch for now. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Samba ACLs - Latest Samba & XFS CVS, Sean Elble |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How to Use Red Hat Install CD Without a Bootable CD Capability?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How to Use Red Hat Install CD Without a Bootable CD Capability?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patch problem, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |