| To: | Paul Rossman <paulr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: DAC960 and XFS blocksize error |
| From: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 15 May 2001 10:32:21 -0400 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B004AC6.1F3DA0EE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Linuxcare, Inc. |
| References: | <3B0038A6.4DBEB316@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yq1lmnzy8lv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3B00458A.D65EC50F@xxxxxxx> <3B004AC6.1F3DA0EE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Rossman <paulr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Paul> Thanks for the patch. I saw the boot stuff from a few days Paul> ago... and I also had those problems, but I didn't need to boot Paul> with an xfs disk so just used the rh71 disks to install... I Paul> didn't get the connection :) Ah, ok. Paul> Should I go ahead and patch the kernel, reboot, then reformat Paul> the disk? Could there be a side effect from having the disk Paul> formatted from the old kernel and using the patched one? Well. If you can mount the filesystem after a reboot, you've been lucky and the superblock ended up in the right spot. Otherwise you'll have to resort to mkfs.xfs. -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com/ SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bad blocks handling?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bad blocks handling?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: DAC960 and XFS blocksize error, Paul Rossman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: DAC960 and XFS blocksize error, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |