xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bad blocks handling?

To: Marten van Wezel <marten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bad blocks handling?
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:32:25 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20010515152920.B26867@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Marten van Wezel wrote:

> Does XFS support Bad blocks handling? I am browsing the web for quite a while
> now but I can't find any reference to how XFS behaves under less then optimal
> hardware conditions?
> 
> What happens when a block on a drive is physically bad, what happens when
> a scsicable is badly connected, etc etc?
> 
> Are there provisions in XFS for this type of problems (mapping out bad blocks
> or perhaps even on-the-fly adjustments) or do we simply have to hope that
> the hardware itself is flawless?

>From the archives:

> > Does anybody know how xfs handles "just appeared" badblocks? If even...
> > How to inform xfs about badblocks (if that's possible) to let xfs avoid them
> > or just kiss hdd goodbye

> A feature just went into XFS which is shutdown on error, which basically
> means that if we get a metadata I/O error the filesystem gets shutdown,
> all processes in the filesystem get errored out of their system calls,
> and you get to type unmount somewhere.

> Steve


-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>