| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS performance issue solved |
| From: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 May 2001 23:46:42 -0500 (CDT) |
| Cc: | Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200105150256.f4F2ufd20620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
This is agreed, about the -W1 flag. Wouldn't asynchronous IO solve this though? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - xfsrestore and suid files, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - xfsdump, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS performance issue solved, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS performance issue solved, Walt H |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |