| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsdump safe? |
| From: | ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner) |
| Date: | Mon, 14 May 2001 10:17:38 +1000 |
| Cc: | <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010513123727.A10204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. What is the main problem with running > it multithreaded on linux -- is it only the missing semaphore implementation > or are there other issues too? It's simply a porting excercise. I have done some of the work using pthreads, but other higher priority projects came along... The only feature multithreading will give you is the ability to dump to multiple tapes simultaneously. Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ACLs vs. umask question, Andrew Gildfind |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ide-scsi problem..., Tom Duffy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsdump safe?, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Can I use XFS and GFS simultaneous?, Oleg Kodak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |