xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Benchmark

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Benchmark
From: "redhat.angus" <redhat.angus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 May 2001 14:17:36 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200105101159.f4ABxnO17545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200105101159.f4ABxnO17545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Le 10 May 2001 06:59:49 -0500, Steve Lord a écrit :
> That's in Spanish right? We used to have a Spanish speaking developer,
> it would be interesting to read the text, if I can remember how to use
> babelfish.... OK, interesting.

I just read the result and XFS is the best except in file deletion.
That why I ask this question but I have probably badly translated my
question, I am very satisfied with the XFS performances, I questioned
myself simply on Alan Cox.

>    o Fix NFS problems in linux xfs which some people have reported
>    o support block sizes other then the page size
>    o rework some vm code usage which will be hard to get into Linus's tree
>    o complete realtime subvolume support
>    o get a standard acl/extended attribute api
>    o get code accepted by Linus
>    o keep up with this email list!
> 
> + the internal list of other things you do not get to see and which contains
>   some MUCH larger work items than the above.

I precisely wanted to know the TODO list. Thanks.

-David




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>