xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Comparing XFS with ext3 and ReiserFS

To: CaT <cat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Comparing XFS with ext3 and ReiserFS
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 12:20:22 +0100
Cc: GCS <gcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010507003457.A478@xxxxxxxxxx>; from cat@xxxxxxxxxx on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:34:57AM +1000
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105061818500.10780-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010506162223.A29723@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010507003457.A478@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Hi,

On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:34:57AM +1000, CaT wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:22:23PM +0200, GCS wrote:
> 
> Small note: ext3 is being ported to 2.4.x by a few folks. SCT is currently
> AFK I believe

Not entirely AFK, just buried in VM stuff.  2.4 can _badly_ under
load on large memory machines, and having a solid 2.4 base is somewhat
a prerequisite for a stable filesystem!

> (if I remember things correctly). I believe the folks doing the port
> are attempting to make SCT's life easier. :)

Yes, there are a number of people helping out here, and the port is
going well.

Cheers,
 Stephen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>