| To: | CaT <cat@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Comparing XFS with ext3 and ReiserFS |
| From: | "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 May 2001 12:20:22 +0100 |
| Cc: | GCS <gcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010507003457.A478@xxxxxxxxxx>; from cat@xxxxxxxxxx on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:34:57AM +1000 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105061818500.10780-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010506162223.A29723@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010507003457.A478@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi, On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:34:57AM +1000, CaT wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:22:23PM +0200, GCS wrote: > > Small note: ext3 is being ported to 2.4.x by a few folks. SCT is currently > AFK I believe Not entirely AFK, just buried in VM stuff. 2.4 can _badly_ under load on large memory machines, and having a solid 2.4 base is somewhat a prerequisite for a stable filesystem! > (if I remember things correctly). I believe the folks doing the port > are attempting to make SCT's life easier. :) Yes, there are a number of people helping out here, and the port is going well. Cheers, Stephen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Comparing XFS with ext3 and ReiserFS, Stephen C. Tweedie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Benchmark, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Comparing XFS with ext3 and ReiserFS, CaT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Comparing XFS with ext3 and ReiserFS, Ragnar Kjørstad |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |