xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS install from ISO fails utterly

To: "Venables, Michael" <Michael.Venables@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS install from ISO fails utterly
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 11:15:31 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from "Venables, Michael" <Michael.Venables@xxxxxxxxxx> of "Tue, 08 May 2001 17:48:00 CDT." <8C91B010B3B7994C88A266E1A72184D3C88CF1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> the mount points were as follows:
> 
>       /               256MB   XFS
>       /boot           64      ext2 (also tried as XFS)
>       /var            512     XFS
>       /tmp            512     XFS
>       /usr            4GB     XFS
>       /home           20GB    XFS
> 
>       swap            256MB
> 
> 


There is one other possibility, that due to the way xfs returns st_blksize 
as 64K by default, you actually filled the root or var partition during
install, could you look in the install log for signs of this. We have found
that some files managed by rpm and email systems are tending to get much
larger than normal. If this was the case then just bumping partition sizes
would be a way out for now.

I did have this very thing happen to me when installing the Ximian gnome
packages on my laptop.

I am looking into making the default behavior closer to ext2 in this area.

Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>