Re: Comparing XFS with ext3 and ReiserFS

[CaT <cat@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:22:23PM +0200, GCS wrote:
> > Does anyone have information on performance? Space utilization?
>  I _think_ performance is about the same for XFS and ReiserFS. I forgot
> to make a compare test, when I moved to XFS from ReiserFS. Oh, and a
> little remark: as I know ext3 patches are for 2.2.x kernels only. It
> seems no one is intrested to port it to 2.4.x kernels. Thus I think ext3
> lost the game here. :-/ About space utilization: as I know ReiserFS can

Small note: ext3 is being ported to 2.4.x by a few folks. SCT is currently
AFK I believe and has plans on doing this himself when he gets back
(if I remember things correctly). I believe the folks doing the port
are attempting to make SCT's life easier. :)

Don't have anything to say about XFS though. Still looking into it and
may have a few q's of my own soon.

:)

-- 
CaT (cat@xxxxxxxxxx)            *** Jenna has joined the channel.
                                <cat> speaking of mental giants..
                                <Jenna> me, a giant, bullshit
                                <Jenna> And i'm not mental
                                        - An IRC session, 20/12/2000