Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> The discussion on linux-kernel and elsewhere makes it sound like some of
> the patches that made it into 2.4.4 have been quickly ripped out (such as
> the fork patch).
> Will these changes make it into the XFS development CVS tree, or will
> folks wait for 2.4.5 before synchronizing?
Generally we resist tossing every 2.4.x-prex version of the linux tree into
simply because we don't want to spend all of our time merging code and
we need some stability.
But if thing in 2.4.4 prove to be horribly broken we may consider moving
> -- Lars
> Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>