xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Will xfs scale to > 1GB/s on any hardware?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Will xfs scale to > 1GB/s on any hardware?
From: Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 18:01:39 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105031455460.27430-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, May 03, 2001 at 02:57:52PM -0500
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <01050321241200.04916@marvin> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105031455460.27430-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 02:57:52PM -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> >From what I've read is that you can get 1GB/s out of xfs, and possibly
> greater. If this is true, then I'd suspect that it would be a good fibre
> setup or possibly a LOT of scsi controllers and disks. Say 4-6 UW160
> controllers  2 channels each and say 4-6 disks per channel. (Pure scsi) If
> fibre, then you should be able to use say 4 Single port Fibre cards
> attatched to enough disks, say 16 or so, to get a reasonable throughput
> like you speak of.

hmm... if you're talking 2 Gbps scsi, that's a total of 8 Gbps or 1GB/s
available bandwidth, and the packet switching in the protocol will definitely
make you lose some of that to overhead. I think he'd need a bit more if he
wanted to actually get 1GB/s from the disks to the system. He'd probably also
need to use a very high-performance bus architecture (is there even one that
fast supported by linux?).

-- 
-> -/-                       - Rahul Jain -                       -\- <-
-> -\- http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=- mailto:rahul-jain@xxxxxxx -/- <-
-> -/- "I never could get the hang of Thursdays." - HHGTTG by DNA -\- <-
|--|--------|--------------|----|-------------|------|---------|-----|-|
   Version 11.423.999.220020101.23.50110101.042
   (c)1996-2000, All rights reserved. Disclaimer available upon request.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>