| To: | "Austin Gonyou" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Will xfs scale to > 1GB/s on any hardware? |
| From: | "Juha Saarinen" <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 May 2001 09:03:42 +1200 |
| Cc: | "William L. Jones" <jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105031559050.27430-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Yes, it's only memory bandwidth, not system bandwidth. I know how to do it... build a huge solid-state RDRAM disk array. ;-) -- Juha :: -----Original Message----- :: From: Austin Gonyou [mailto:austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] :: Sent: Friday, 4 May 2001 09:00 :: To: Juha Saarinen :: Cc: William L. Jones; linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx :: Subject: RE: Will xfs scale to > 1GB/s on any hardware? :: :: :: If you head down that road you're about correct. Alot of docs out there :: support your claim, but I think that might ONLY be the memory bandwidth. :: If you're just using IDE, now way in hell, if you're using UW160 SCSI, :: with many drives on caching controller, you could very possibly hit that. :: Fibre channel would be about the only way to hit that limit with :: the least :: drives. :: |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New thread: Manually creating the 2.4.4 XFS tree, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Will xfs scale to > 1GB/s on any hardware?, William L. Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Will xfs scale to > 1GB/s on any hardware?, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Will xfs scale to > 1GB/s on any hardware?, William L. Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |