xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: strange files, XFS bug?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: strange files, XFS bug?
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 14:35:27 -0400
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105031528580.10540-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I'm sure this compiler issue won't go away soon.

But just as an overview of what is working and what isn't

XFS Release 1.0:

     gcc 2.91.66  well tested know to work, use this for stability

    gcc 2.95.2/3/4 reported to work, not extensively tested, use as own risk

    gcc 2.96     does not work, gives compilation errors.

    gcc 2.95RH7.1    ditto.

    gcc 2.96Mandrake Not attempted yet.

XFS current:
    gcc 2.91.66    same as R 1.0

    gcc 2.95.2/3/4    same as R 1.0

    gcc 2.96        does not work, compilation errors

    gcc 2.96RH7.1    compiles, boots, and initial tests show it to be working

    gcc 2.96Mandrake    compiles, boots, and initial tests show it to be working

As always there is a big difference between what is "supported" and what 
"works".

We are saying R 1.0 is supported (in the loose sense of Open Source supported)

by compiling with gcc 2.91.66, everything else is "use at your own risk" at this

point.

--
Russell Cattelan
--
Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to SGI
Linux XFS core developer.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>