xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: compilation failure

To: "Chmouel Boudjnah" <chmouel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: compilation failure
From: "Steve Wray" <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:24:49 +1200
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <m3d79qomx4.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry, I had been under the (obviously  mistaken) impression
that since I had the latest release of Mandrake, that it would
have a (default) C compiler that actually compiled basic things
like the kernel.

Crazy... we still have to have 2 different C compilers!
I thought this was just a bug in what was it Redhat 6 or something?

Why on earth are we still suffering this?

And thanks for the swift response!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chmouel Boudjnah [mailto:chmouel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 8:30 PM
> To: Nathan Scott
> Cc: Steve Wray; linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: compilation failure
> 
> 
> "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html ...
> > "Q: Are there any known issues about gcc 2.95 for compiling
> > the XFS kernel tree?"
> 
> 
> Would be possible to make this changes in the FAQ :
> 
> --- /tmp/faq    Thu May  3 09:25:24 2001
> +++ /tmp/faq.new        Thu May  3 09:29:06 2001
> @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
>  Q: Are there any known issues about gcc 2.95 for compiling the 
> XFS kernel tree?
>  
>  Yes. So far there were some problems reported with kernels built with
> -gcc 2.95 which were solved by compiling it with egcs 2.91.66 (or kgcc
> -on RedHat 7.x systems). So for now please use version gcc 2.91.66 (aka
> -egcs 1.1.2) to build your XFS kernel. If you are using a debian or
> +gcc 2.95 which were solved by compiling it with egcs 2.91.66[*] So for
> +now please use version gcc 2.91.66[*] to build your XFS kernel. 
> If you are using a debian or
>  SuSE based system this means that you may have to find and install
>  this egcs version. Please note that the problems with gcc 2.95 seem to
>  be restriced to the i386 platform - on the ppc it works just fine with
>  2.95 for instance. All said for gcc 2.95 also applies to redhat's gcc
>  2.96. On the other hand the gcc 2.95.3 (20010125) from debian unstalbe
>  seems to work.
> +
> +[*] It's called kgcc on a Red Hat system and are located in the
> +compat-egcs package, on a Linux-Mandrake system it's located in the
> +egcs package.
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>