| To: | Igor Pruchanskiy <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux-2.4-xfs-1.0.patch |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 02 May 2001 21:48:47 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20010502174113.A21501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AF0AA07.C4A72E6C@xxxxxxx> <20010502175326.B21501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AF0AD79.5712D5D9@xxxxxxx> <20010502194642.A21682@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Igor Pruchanskiy wrote: > > The funny thing is that either one of the patches applys cleanly on it's own. > but as soon as you start adding a second patch it starts complaining..... Yes, that's expected. -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: linux-2.4-xfs-1.0.patch, Igor Pruchanskiy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: linux-2.4-xfs-1.0.patch, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: linux-2.4-xfs-1.0.patch, Igor Pruchanskiy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linux-2.4-xfs-1.0.patch, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |