[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS question

To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS question
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 01:44:11 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3AEF3FB4.73AC80FB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Russell Cattelan wrote:

> Rahul Jain wrote:
> > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:40:40PM -0400, Castellanos, Leon wrote:
> > > I just converted all my file systems to xfs and have a few questions to
> > > which I did not find answers to in the website. First, I would like to 
> > > know
> > > why it is that xfs doesn't like to be mounted "ro" read-only. I didn't 
> > > find
> > > anyone addressing this issue and had to figure out on my own to change the
> > > /etc/lilo.conf entry "read-only" to "read-write".
> Hmm never tried that... guess we'll have to look at that.

I see this on RedHat too. It spits out a warning if it has to replay it's
log to mount the fs. After that it _is_ mounted ro.
You can't really mount a journaling fs without logreplay. Maybe you could
but would you really want that?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>