[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RH 7.1 installer errors

To: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RH 7.1 installer errors
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 19:03:30 -0400
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Michael Steigman <steigman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <3AEEBB28.8AAFCC75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AEEE251.306EF354@xxxxxxx> <3AEF0B34.C0F12FCD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AEF0CB9.A4D0F59C@xxxxxxx> <yq18zkgn5rz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Martin K. Petersen" wrote:

> >>>>> "Eric" == Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> writes:
> >> The installation went fine after loading the update disk. However,
> >> upon reboot, raidautorun reports "failed to open /dev/md0" which
> >> obviously leads to a kernel panic (my / is on md0). Suggestions?
> Eric> Hm... hopefully Martin or Russell can speak to this - I don't
> Eric> have any raid machines here, and have not ever tested it...
> Eric> Could this be a devfs thing?  Has /dev/md0 moved to /dev/md/0
> Eric> perhaps?  If devfsd hasn't started, the compatibility links
> Eric> won't be there if / isn't even mounted.
> That's probably the case, yes.

Wouldn't this be before / is mounted? so  it probably doesn't matter  if

/dev/ is real or devfs.

How does the kernel find and mount / if it is an md device?  the dev_id
is usually
part of the lilo boot process but in the md case?

> --
> Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc.
> mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com/
> SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/

Russell Cattelan
Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to SGI
Linux XFS core developer.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>