xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ?

To: "'Pietje Puk'" <lbalbalba@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ?
From: "Christian, Chip" <chip.christian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:47:41 -0400
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I don't understand the question.  They ship kernel patches and they ship 
pre-patched RedHat kernel-source rpms.  What more do you want?

-----Original Message-----
From: Pietje Puk [mailto:lbalbalba@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 14:22
To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ?



Dear SGI,

As a linux user, I really appreciate your efforts to port your high quality 
filesystem XFS to linux as open source. However, I cannot understand your 
release scheme. You must understand that people will just want to download a 
tarball, `patch` the patches, and `./configure;make all;make install`. I 
sincerely feel that lots more people would give this fine fs a try if you 
would find the time to release XFS as a tarball, which people could just 
install by applying a patch to the kernel source, and compile by issuing a 
'make all' on the command prompt.
Just my 2$...

Anyways, keep up the good work.



Sincerely,

J.Smith

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>