xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS

To: Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 22:14:25 -0700
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: Namesys
References: <156560000.990028380@tiny>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Chris Mason wrote:

> > Thanks Chris, I totally agree, and at the moment I am much too busy to
> > spend time in a performance competition. I should also state that I have
> > never regarded the different filesystem on Linux as being in direct
> > competition with each other, there will always be benefits to using each
> > different filesystem for their strong points. Plus having several
> > filesystems under active development means that there will be a tendency
> > for the developers to make theirs the best, the implementations improve,
> > and everyone wins.

reiser4's architecture will be strongly influenced by the XFS pioneered delayed
allocation concept, and I would like to thank the XFS team for aggressively
ensuring that I understood the benefits of it.

Hans

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>