After running an xfs_repair, that FS seems to be all good in general now.
I'm going to perform one more test. In this test I'll blow away the
volume, recreate it as a 6GB volume, run xfs_repair immediately, mount,
then extend, grow, repeat. I'll post results and specifications when done.
Thanks for helping guys!
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 18 May 2001, kris buggenhout wrote:
> Austin Gonyou wrote:
> >
> > Yeah..I know, but this seems pretty severe. Usually things of this
> > severity seem to get talked about on the list immediately, so I didn't
> > know if anyone was listening out there or not. Sorry for the bother!
> > Thanks for the reply!
> >
> > --
> > Austin Gonyou
> > Systems Architect, CCNA
> > Coremetrics, Inc.
> > Phone: 512-796-9023
> > email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > On Thu, 17 May 2001, Steve Lord wrote:
> >
> > > > Has ANYONE looked into this? It seems pretty serious. Anyone?
> > >
> > > Not yet - patience, if this was a commercial release you would have
> > > to wait several months for a fix ;-)
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 16 May 2001, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On the system I've been testing LVM+XFS with, I've run into a bit of a
> > > > > dilemma. If I try to resize the a volume more than once, I get the
> > > > > following error message:
>
> I've had the same problem ..
>
> workaround : run an xfs_repair on it and it doesnt throw any errors. I
> tried this multiple times.
> the resize leave's the fs in a non consistent state... I think an
> umount/mount could also fix the prob.. ( replaying the log ...)
>
|