xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DAC960 and XFS blocksize error

To: Paul Rossman <paulr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DAC960 and XFS blocksize error
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 May 2001 10:32:21 -0400
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B004AC6.1F3DA0EE@evanston.fluent.com>
Organization: Linuxcare, Inc.
References: <3B0038A6.4DBEB316@evanston.fluent.com> <yq1lmnzy8lv.fsf@jcb.mkp.net> <3B00458A.D65EC50F@sgi.com> <3B004AC6.1F3DA0EE@evanston.fluent.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft)
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Rossman <paulr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Paul> Thanks for the patch. I saw the boot stuff from a few days
Paul> ago... and I also had those problems, but I didn't need to boot
Paul> with an xfs disk so just used the rh71 disks to install... I
Paul> didn't get the connection :)

Ah, ok.


Paul> Should I go ahead and patch the kernel, reboot, then reformat
Paul> the disk?  Could there be a side effect from having the disk
Paul> formatted from the old kernel and using the patched one?

Well.  If you can mount the filesystem after a reboot, you've been
lucky and the superblock ended up in the right spot.

Otherwise you'll have to resort to mkfs.xfs.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc.
mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.linuxcare.com/
SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>