| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Benchmark |
| From: | Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 10 May 2001 17:26:53 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <6DEE94132593D41182D200508BDCA59045F6AE@mail.tricord.com> |
| References: | <6DEE94132593D41182D200508BDCA59045F6AE@mail.tricord.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 10 May 2001 07:32:56 -0500, Mostek, Jim wrote: > > and XFS was faster for everything except the delete of a tar tree (which we > expect > because of the sync transaction on remove, right?). Oh, BTW, can someone detail on this, please? I saw that XFS is slow when erasing huge file trees (for ex.: when emptying a Squid cache :-) ). Why is it so? I'm not saying it's a bug, i'm just asking why... -- Florin Andrei "Imagine working in a secure environment and finding the string _NSAKEY in the OS binaries without a good explanation." - Alan Cox |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Long Term Commitment to Linux XFS,, Juha Saarinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Benchmark, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Benchmark, Federico Sevilla III |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |