| To: | "Venables, Michael" <Michael.Venables@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS install from ISO fails utterly |
| From: | "linux" <dahouet@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 09 May 2001 00:11:55 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <8C91B010B3B7994C88A266E1A72184D3C88CED@cceexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net> |
| References: | <8C91B010B3B7994C88A266E1A72184D3C88CED@cceexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Le 08/05/2001 à 16:56 Venables, Michael a écrit : >1) according to the installer, you seem to be able to create a 100% XFS >system, but there's no mention of whether or not LILO has to go into the >MBR >to support this. is this still true? >2) many people have recommended leaving /boot as ext2, is this still >advisable? i'm using right now a fully xfs server with a 2.4.4 kernel. no /boot ext2, only one / with xfs. nothing to change from lilo part.... i'm tracking some problem on anormal shutdown and startup but i can't say if it's a xfs problem. i'll post these results. thanks @++ o |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tuning XFS for peak performance. (fwd), Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: question on XFS+devfsd, and a quick suggestion, Russel Ingram |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS install from ISO fails utterly, Venables, Michael |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS install from ISO fails utterly, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |