xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: chacl usage

To: "Christian, Chip" <chip.christian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: chacl usage
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 11:04:27 +1000
Cc: "'Linux XFS (E-mail)'" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <23D04BDBA646D411BDDD00D0B774B539028C888A@SA-BWMAIL1>; from chip.christian@storageapps.com on Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:38:34AM -0400
References: <23D04BDBA646D411BDDD00D0B774B539028C888A@SA-BWMAIL1>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Christian,

On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:38:34AM -0400, Christian, Chip wrote:
> Oh, and I specified
>       CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
> when building the kernel.
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Christian, Chip
> > Sent:       Friday, May 04, 2001 11:37
> > To: Linux XFS (E-mail)
> > Subject:    chacl usage
> >
> > Am I missing something to get acls to work on XFS?  I'm on a frsh RedHat 
> > 7.1install, built a kernel from the 1.0 XFS release.  I installed the SGI
acl-1.0.1-0.  Built an XFS filesystem:
> >
> > [root@betanas1 pkgs]# chacl u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rwx foo
> > chacl: error setting access acl on "foo": Function not implemented

This is strange.
The only way I know that you'd be getting ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
for ACLs is if CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set.
(See linux/fs/noposix_acl.c (used in linux/fs/Makefile))

Are you sure you have the right kernel running ?

--Tim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>