| To: | Johannes Eriksson <joheriks@xxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS on SuSE7.1 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 May 2001 14:27:02 -0500 |
| References: | <3AF3BF07.5C0E03CB@wipro.co.in> <3AF41C77.D1A23AA9@sgi.com> <20010505200401.A16626@infa.abo.fi> <3AF43774.62270B72@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Ah, I see now that it's probably a result of building the userspace packages on an older system - the man location is set during "configure" so if it's in /usr/man rather than /usr/share/man, that's probably a result of building on a non-FHS 2.0 compliant system. Still, next spin, we can clean that up. Thanks for pointing it out! -Eric Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Johannes Eriksson wrote: > > > Why? Red Hat 7.x also puts man pages in /usr/share/man, which is where > > they should be according to FHS 2.0. > > Good question. :) Nathan did the RPM packages, I think - we can > probably fix that up next time around. -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: suggestion: splitting the xfs list, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Incredibly slow rebuild of small access_db on xfs partition, Jarek Luberek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS on SuSE7.1, Chmouel Boudjnah |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS on SuSE7.1, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |