xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS on SuSE7.1

To: Johannes Eriksson <joheriks@xxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS on SuSE7.1
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 14:27:02 -0500
References: <3AF3BF07.5C0E03CB@wipro.co.in> <3AF41C77.D1A23AA9@sgi.com> <20010505200401.A16626@infa.abo.fi> <3AF43774.62270B72@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ah, I see now that it's probably a result of building the userspace
packages on an older system - the man location is set during "configure"
so if it's in /usr/man rather than /usr/share/man, that's probably a
result of building on a non-FHS 2.0 compliant system.

Still, next spin, we can clean that up.

Thanks for pointing it out!

-Eric

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
> Johannes Eriksson wrote:
> 
> > Why? Red Hat 7.x also puts man pages in /usr/share/man, which is where
> > they should be according to FHS 2.0.
> 
> Good question.  :)  Nathan did the RPM packages, I think - we can
> probably fix that up next time around.

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>