| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: strange files, XFS bug? |
| From: | Adam Cioccarelli <alciocca@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 May 2001 15:30:06 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | "redhat.angus" <redhat.angus@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010503150132.036cdea8@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
It is better not to use any version of gcc 2.96 see http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-2.96.html Adam On Thu, 3 May 2001, Seth Mos wrote: > At 14:46 3-5-2001 +0200, redhat.angus wrote: > >Le 03 May 2001 14:40:50 +0200, Seth Mos a écrit : > > > I believe that the other one that also suffered corruption also had a SMP > > > machine with a via chipset? > > > Am I correct, or just mixing things up. > > > >no SMP and no via chipset for me, pure SCSI > >I always use linux-2.4-xfs cvs branch and sometimes gcc-2.96RH > > What is the scsi controller used in this system? > And it is better not to use the gcc-2.96RH unless it's the updated one. > > > >-David > > Cheers > > -- > Seth > Every program has two purposes > one for which it was written and > another for which it wasn't > I make the last kind. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: strange files, XFS bug?, redhat.angus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: strange files, XFS bug?, redhat.angus |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: strange files, XFS bug?, Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: strange files, XFS bug?, redhat.angus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |