xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-2.4-xfs-1.0.patch

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-2.4-xfs-1.0.patch
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 21:47:44 -0500
Cc: Igor Pruchanskiy <igor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20010502174113.A21501@linuxinside.com> <3AF0AA07.C4A72E6C@sgi.com> <20010502175326.B21501@linuxinside.com> <3AF0AD79.5712D5D9@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Eric Sandeen wrote:

Please be aware anything in the "testing" directory should be considered 
potentially
broken.

This patch has been removed at this point since the devel tree has been updated 
to 2.4.4


> Igor Pruchanskiy wrote:
> >
> > doh! my fault....
> >
> > that worked, but now linux-2.4.4-xfsTEST.patch won't apply complaining 
> > about already patched files....
>
> That's because 2.4.4-xfsTEST is not a released version, and is packaged
> differently.  It contains all patched files, while the official,
> released patches are broken into "core linux" and "xfs filesystem"
> patches.
>
> I guess that's not obvious, but we don't expect people to mix-n-match
> patches... :)
>
> -Eric
>
> --
> Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
> sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>