| To: | Pietje Puk <lbalbalba@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ? |
| From: | K Mitchell Russell <kmrussel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 May 2001 16:52:15 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <F16743TuylJc0xvlUQ90000e2bc@hotmail.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Pietje Puk wrote: > > Dear SGI, > > As a linux user, I really appreciate your efforts to port your high quality > filesystem XFS to linux as open source. However, I cannot understand your > release scheme. You must understand that people will just want to download a > tarball, `patch` the patches, and `./configure;make all;make install`. I Aren't these the patches here? : ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0/patches/ RPMs are available, as well as the bleeding edge source tree via CVS too. Enjoy, Mitchell |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RH 7.1 installer errors, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RH 7.1 installer errors, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ?, Pietje Puk |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Why release XFS as patches against a kernel ?, Christian, Chip |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |