| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: severe fs corruption |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:39:04 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010430151729.A24568@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3AEDAEDE.67CB59F3@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104290735200.31176-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AEDAEDE.67CB59F3@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 15:17 30-4-2001 -0400, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/ugly_log.bz2I reinstalled the machine anyway but made copies of all filesystems (using dd).The image I ran xfs_check on was made while the fs was unmounted. (I must say I'm beginning to suspect hardware problems..) Ugh, it almost looks like running xfs_check on /dev/random. Can you give some details about the hardware? -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I make the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: severe fs corruption, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.4, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: severe fs corruption, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: severe fs corruption, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |