| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and 'rpm --rebuilddb' |
| From: | Martin Spott <mas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:48:51 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <200104241445.f3OEjGA01196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:45:16AM -0500 |
| References: | <20010424152707.A10586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200104241445.f3OEjGA01196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.12i |
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:45:16AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > You could also try mounting with this option: > > -o biosize=13 That one delivers the desired solution. It's even a little less space comsuming than ReiserFS. As I'm happy with it now, I didn't try the suggested source code change, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: malformed patch, Martin Spott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS - Performance Optimazation., C.G.Senthilkumar. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and 'rpm --rebuilddb', Martin Spott |
| Next by Thread: | What patches should I use?, Olaf Frączyk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |