xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS PRE 0.10. and REDHAT 7.1 and 7.0

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS PRE 0.10. and REDHAT 7.1 and 7.0
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:39:24 +0200
Cc: "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx '" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3AE51CD1.4AA8943B@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <ED27E37B9488D211B2170004ACE83F630136BE4A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 01:27 24-4-2001 -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote:
Joseph Gilberto wrote:

The 0.10.0 installer requires the wolverine CDs.
Check the disc id
.disk1-i386  should contain magic number:982439362.228105

0.9  -- RH 7.0 based
0.10  -- RH wolverine based
0.10.3 > RH 7.1 based

Currently the "Release 1.0 test3" images will install a RH 7.1 based
system
and a RH7.1 based kernel + XFS

I also found a 0.10-4 on the linux-xfs machine. I already downloaded that.
I upgraded my home redhat 6.2 with xfs system with out which seemed to go alright. I couldn't boot the linux kernel entry that was installed after the upgrade. I have not really checked out what's wrong. I just booted one of the CVS kernels that was still available :-)

Other then some logrotate and segfault crap because of other library's it seemed to work ok. But then again, this machine was not quite redhat 6.2 anymore so those errors are excused.

This is the most stable / recommend version of XFS at this point.

So what's newer in the .10-4 version then?

Bye
--
Seth
Every program has two purposes
one for which it was written and
another for which it wasn't
I make the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>