xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: stupid article

from [Nathan Scott] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Mike Gigante <mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: stupid article
From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:30:32 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Mike Gigante <mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Re: stupid article" (Apr 24, 11:25am)
References: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10104241123430.280601-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Apr 24, 11:25am, Mike Gigante wrote:
> Subject: Re: stupid article
> 
> Well, on oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs it still says
> 
> SGI XFS Pre-Release 0.10 is now available 
> 
> Mind you, I think a big bright "XFS 1.0 is officially released"
> banner on the front page of oss.sgi.com would be a good idea,
> as well as a feature article on www.sgi.com (sez Tony (tonza@melbourne).
> 

...thats because 1.0 hasn't been released yet.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: stupid article, Mike Gigante
Next by Date:  Re: stupid article, Mike Gigante
Previous by Thread:  Re: stupid article, Mike Gigante
Next by Thread:  Re: stupid article, Mike Gigante
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]