xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: stage2.img

To: wfrancis@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: stage2.img
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:08:02 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200104240000.f3O00sv23285@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
wfrancis@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> You guys are breakin my heart...
> 
> In test2 the SMP kernel was _just_ too big to fit onto
> my lovely boot floppies. Now in test3, XFS no longer
> is the filesystem created with kickstart. 

It's not?  I don't think we changed this... at one point we changed the
_default_ over to xfs, and I don't think that has changed.  (but I'll
look to be sure)  We have always had an "fs" option in kickstart for
each partition, which can be specified as either ext2 or xfs...  

> Looking at
> the directories, I noticed that test3 does not have
> the stage2.img, 

Um... are you sure?  see -
ftp://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0-test3/RH7.1-SGI-XFS-0.10.4/RedHat/base/stage2.img

Should be on the iso as well...

> which is where I would imagine the
> magic would be happening. 

Lots of magic happens there - if it's really missing, then the install
won't work.

> But, the test3 smp kernel is
> plenty small enough to fit onto a floppy. I didn't
> see the bootnet.img files in

ftp://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.0-test3/RH7.1-SGI-XFS-0.10.4/images/bootnet.imgtest3
either.

> Is it meant now that you would copy the Red Hat 7.1 CDs
> into a common directory, and then copy test2 AND test3
> over them? 

No, it's not incremental like that.

> Is it possible to simply use the bootnet and
> stage2 images from test2 with test3?

Possibly,  but probably not, and you shouldn't need to.  Are you sure
you got all the right bits?
 
-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>