xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS on LVM

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS on LVM
From: thomas graichen <list-linux.sgi.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:12:35 +0200
Distribution: local
Organization: spoiled dot org
References: <3AE275FA.4BABF15@xxxxxxxxxxx> <yq166fxje2e.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3AE3AFC5.CE9F8386@xxxxxxxxxxx> <yq1snizhnz8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3-XFS (i586))
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ric" == Ric Tibbetts <ric@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ric> PS: You guys may want to change the documentation that's on your
> Ric> web site. In the FAQ, it addresses the issue of XFS on LVM, and
> Ric> recomends applying the LVM patch. Since it obviously causes
> Ric> breakage (at least for the recent kernel) maybe you should
> Ric> indicate that. I might save someone else some hassle.

> The LVM and RAID sections of the FAQ are quite out of sync with our
> current bits, I'm afraid.

> Thomas, are you out there?

yes i am - i'll try to fix it but i can't guarantie it - because
i'll leave for a short journey to zuerich in under two hours ...
but i can guarantie that i will fix it at the weekend if it
won't be done today :-)

t

-- 
thomas graichen <tgr@xxxxxxxxxxx> ... perfection is reached, not
when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no
longer anything to take away. --- antoine de saint-exupery

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>