[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS in RHL 7.1

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS in RHL 7.1
From: "Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:21:53 +0200
In-reply-to: <3ADE26CB.6F1766ED@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 07:44:11PM -0400
Organisation: Cluon Research Center
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104190943500.17050-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3ADE26CB.6F1766ED@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 19:44:11 -0400,
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not unless they specifically change the Makefile back to gcc.
> Our installer has add compat-egcs when the kernel development option
> is selected so recompiling the kernel with kgcc shouldn't be any more
> or less painful.

not everybody uses redhat, so not everybody has easy access to old versions
of gcc/egcs. i understand that sgi does not want to support every possible
distribution out there. but a little bit more of distribution-agnosticism
would be nice.

> Due to some not technical delays with the 1.0 release it looks like we
> will have time to consider our options.

supporting 2.96 would be great, and would make life for non-redhat users
much easier.

Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr  | ignorami: n: The BOFH art of folding problem 
<mike+sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |           lusers into representational shapes.

Attachment: pgpblgkayKvyO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>