On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 19:44:11 -0400,
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not unless they specifically change the Makefile back to gcc.
> Our installer has add compat-egcs when the kernel development option
> is selected so recompiling the kernel with kgcc shouldn't be any more
> or less painful.
not everybody uses redhat, so not everybody has easy access to old versions
of gcc/egcs. i understand that sgi does not want to support every possible
distribution out there. but a little bit more of distribution-agnosticism
would be nice.
> Due to some not technical delays with the 1.0 release it looks like we
> will have time to consider our options.
supporting 2.96 would be great, and would make life for non-redhat users
Thomas 'Mike' Michlmayr | ignorami: n: The BOFH art of folding problem
<mike+sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | lusers into representational shapes.
Description: PGP signature