| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: recommended compiler ? |
| From: | daedalus@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:05:41 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20010414015951.A18631@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <01041318561900.07467@cosanostra> <3AD73269.8E759CA2@xxxxxxxxxx> <3AD734D9.519BCEF1@xxxxxxx> <20010414015951.A18631@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:59:51 +0200, GCS <gcs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you trust in me, then use 2.95.3, but not 2.95.2. Trust him! I had reported a success with 2.95.2 and 2.4.3-04012001, but I had to disable all of the options for XFS, including debugging. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: recommended compiler ?, GCS |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Warnings with gcc 2.95.3, GCS |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: recommended compiler ?, GCS |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - patch puller update, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |