xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS assertion failed: tp->t_blk_res_used <= tp->t_blk_res, file: xfs

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS assertion failed: tp->t_blk_res_used <= tp->t_blk_res, file: xfs_trans.c, line: 335
From: KELEMEN Peter <fuji@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 14:31:32 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200104072146.f37LkLu11686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 04:46:21PM -0500
Organization: ELTE Eotvos Lorand University of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
References: <20010407214610.A1436@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200104072146.f37LkLu11686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: KELEMEN Peter <fuji@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
* Steve Lord (lord@xxxxxxx) [20010407 16:46]:

> We had a few days this week between good trees, I broke it on
> Monday or Tuesday and the fix for this was checked in on the
> 5th.

Confirmed.  04/09 tree works fine.

> The repair output would probably disappear after a mount of the
> filesystem.

Indeed.

> Repair does not take into account replaying the log, only
> mounting the filesystem would do this.

Is there any (planned) way of forcing (virtual) log replay?

Peter

-- 
    .+'''+.         .+'''+.         .+'''+.         .+'''+.         .+''
 Kelemen Péter     /       \       /       \       /      fuji@xxxxxxx
.+'         `+...+'         `+...+'         `+...+'         `+...+'

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>