| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS assertion failed: tp->t_blk_res_used <= tp->t_blk_res, file: xfs_trans.c, line: 335 |
| From: | Rob Aagaard <rawb@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:04:16 -0600 |
| Cc: | KELEMEN Peter <fuji@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200104072202.f37M23n13161@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from lord@xxxxxxx on Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 05:02:03PM -0500 |
| References: | <lord@xxxxxxx> <200104072202.f37M23n13161@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.17i |
Ahh, thanks, looks like that fixes it.
Thank goodness for multiple boxes in the same room.
Well, next time you are in Salt Lake City, UT. Give me a call looks like I owe
you guys lunch.
Thanks,
Rob
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, I thought we had this fixed, I ran some fairly heavy tests on a
> > debug kernel, are you sure everything was uptodate and rebuilt from
> > the current code base?
> >
> > Steve
> >
>
> I should expand on that, the current development code base from the
> linux-2.4-xfs development tree.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - quota-3.01-pre3, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Large sequential reads., Kalvinder Singh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS assertion failed: tp->t_blk_res_used <= tp->t_blk_res, file: xfs_trans.c, line: 335, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS assertion failed: tp->t_blk_res_used <= tp->t_blk_res, file: xfs_trans.c, line: 335, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |